Topic summary
⁠96%2 analyzed articles/videos675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Detention Centers results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 1,063 hits. Analysis detected 6,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,723 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,620 of 16,562 topics). This Ice Detention Centers is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Ice Detention Centers
Topic details
Total words: 3,723
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
4.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 28.6%28.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 19.3%19.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 28.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 2.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Red Herring: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos