ICE Contractor Arrested After Shooting Protester Who Was Walking Away 43%

By Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling58%

7/17/2026, 8:17:27 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 539 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (11,845 of 20,498 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the article peer group.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has yet more blood on its hands. 
An employee at an ICE detention facility in Aurora, Colorado, shot a protester Thursday evening, Aurora Police Department shared in a written news release . 
The woman was hit in her lower body but is expected to survive. 
The suspected shooter is Brandon Booth, a 42-year-old who works for ICE contractor GEO Group. 
Moments before the violent incident, Booth and other facility employees were waiting in their cars on Nome Street, reportedly unable to enter the detention center due to an anti-ICE protest, according to local law enforcement. 
Police say that two women broke off from the demonstration, verbally confronted Booth, took photos of his car, and walked away. 
But Booth wouldn’t let them. 
Instead, he grabbed his pistol and fired a shot at the women, striking one in the lower body, according to the police report. 
He then hopped back into his car and drove away before he was caught by Aurora Police. 
The department noted that additional officers found Booth in his car with his gun “a short distance away” after he fled the scene. 
Booth was booked on probable cause of attempted second-degree murder, first-degree assault, attempted first-degree assault, felony menacing, and unlawful carrying of a concealed weapon. 
In a statement to Colorado Public Media , a spokesperson for GEO Group acknowledged that one of its off-duty employees had been involved in a shooting. 
“This individual has been placed on unpaid administrative leave, and we will fully cooperate with law enforcement,” the spokesperson said. 
“This is a tragedy on all fronts, and the Aurora Police Department will investigate this incident with the same commitment to transparency and integrity as we do all shootings,” said Aurora Chief of Police Todd Chamberlain. 
“We remain committed to ensuring an ethical, thorough, objective, and comprehensive review of this case. 
Violence of any kind will not be tolerated in Aurora. 
Constitutional rights are a pivotal part of a just society—violence is not.” 
The attack is the latest in a long string of domestic bloodshed by ICE and its contractors. 
Just this month, federal agents have shot and killed at least two people: Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero, who was killed in Biddeford, Maine, despite having a valid work permit and Social Security number, as well as Lorenzo Salgado Araujo, a 52-year-old Mexican father of three and a local small-business owner who was killed in Houston. 
There have now been 11 fatal shootings by ICE agents since Donald Trump returned to office and made mass deportations a cornerstone of his second-term agenda. 
In January, federal agents shot and killed 37-year-old mother Renee Nicole Good and, days later, ICU nurse Alex Pretti. 
Both were U.S. citizens. 
Their deaths sparked national outrage and further exacerbated the local pandemonium in Minneapolis that started weeks prior with Trump’s sudden decision to occupy the city with federal agents. 
It’s been over six months since their deaths, but still virtually nothing has come of the federal investigation into the extrajudicial killings. 
Instead, Washington has reportedly utilized its heft to stow critical evidence —such as Good’s vehicle—away from the local and private detectives attempting to hold their killers accountable. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.2%newrepublic.com: 6.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Anchoring Bias2.8%This article: 10.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.8%newrepublic.com: 3.3%Availability Heuristic10.0%This article: 10.9%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.1%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic10.9%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 9.5%newrepublic.com: 8.0%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.8%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Optimism Bias2.8%This article: 4.1%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 2.5%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 30.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.5%newrepublic.com: 13.0%Negativity Bias30.6%This article: 3.7%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.7%newrepublic.com: 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.3%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.6%newrepublic.com: 1.4%Recency Bias3.5%This article: 9.1%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.5%Primacy Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 3.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.7%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.1%newrepublic.com: 3.4%Appeal to Authority6.7%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.0%newrepublic.com: 1.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 5.2%newrepublic.com: 7.9%Hasty Generalization7.2%This article: 6.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Red Herring6.5%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.0%newrepublic.com: 6.3%Appeal to Emotion14.5%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 25.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 3.9%newrepublic.com: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)25.2%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.4%newrepublic.com: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%newrepublic.com: 2.0%Anecdotal10.2%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.9%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.8%newrepublic.com: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.9%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%newrepublic.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.6%newrepublic.com: 2.2%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%newrepublic.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 24.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.4%newrepublic.com: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice24.5%This article: 1.9%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 2.4%Indoctrination1.9%This article: 20.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.8%newrepublic.com: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias20.2%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.2%newrepublic.com: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%newrepublic.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

539 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers34%attributed speech355writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageAurora Police Department • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAurora Police • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAurora Police • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGEO Group • 26 words • 0.0% coverageGEO Group • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 36 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 10 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Chamberlain • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Todd Chamberlain

100%flagged-word coverage
73 attributed words40% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.2 ptsWriter: 37.2%Todd Chamberlain: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-30.7 ptsWriter: 30.7%Todd Chamberlain: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+13.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Todd Chamberlain: 13.7%13.7%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.