Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Protester Violence results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 314 hits. Analysis detected 2,323 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,617 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,769 topics). This Protester Violence is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Protester Violence
Topic details
Total words: 1,617
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 16.8%16.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.4%19.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 13.4%13.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.1%16.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos