Topic summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,073 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ice Actions results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 1,887 hits . Analysis detected 11,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,909 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,306 of 15,689 topics). This Ice Actions is worse (more manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Ice Actions
Topic details
Total words: 5,909
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.6% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 31.9% 31.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 25.3% 25.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 20.3% 20.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst