Speaker summary
69% 13 analyzed articles/videos 409.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The New York Post results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Recency Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.6% saturation with 134.954 hits . Analysis detected 1,096.267 faulty-reasoning hits from 409.333 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (23,606 of 26,780 speakers). This The New York Post is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. The New York Post
Speaker details
Total words: 409.333
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 10.3% BS Score13 analyzed videos409.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 16.6% 16.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 16.2% 16.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Horn Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst