Nolan Wells' body to be flown hundreds of miles to new state as attorney reveals 'deleted messages' concerns 41%

By Patrick Reilly35%

7/9/2026, 12:46:24 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 36.3% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 726 faulty-reasoning hits from 333 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,924 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the article peer group.

See more of our coverage in your search results. 
Add The New York Post on Google 
Nolan Wells’ body will be flown more than 800 miles for an independent autopsy  as his family’s lawyer revealed they have concerns about “deleted messages” on his cell phone. 
Wells, an 18-year-old college football player, was found dead on Monday days after he vanished on a Fourth of July boating trip to Horn Island, Mississippi, with his friends  who left the island without him , according to police. 
His family have since retained the services of prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump, who is flying Wells’ body to Washington DC for an autopsy as part of independent investigation into the teen’s death , which he claims is full of “contradictions.” 
Authorities say 18-year-old Nolan Wells was last seen Saturday around 3 p.m. 
Facebook/Christine Wonsley 
Nolan Wells with his mother Christine Wonsley. 
Facebook/Christine Wonsley 
Wells’ pals told police he wanted to stay on the island, where he was last seen talking with a girl, but “they took his cell phone,” Crump told ABC News. 
“That’s not adding up to them. 
The fact that when the family gets the cell phone back  they’re saying they are trying to understand why there are deleted messages and so it’s very concerning to them.” 
His family have since retained the services of prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump. 
USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect 
The woman who he was last seen speaking to around 3 p.m. 
Saturday had said that after they talked “Nolan said he was going back to the boat,” Crump said. 
“And then the boys on the boat said, ‘No, Nolan told them he was going to stay with her.’ 
And so they are conflicting. 
She’s saying he went and got on the boat. 
They saying he didn’t get on the boat. 
So which is it?” 
he asked. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.7%Patrick Reilly: 3.2%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 3.9%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.8%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.1%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Patrick Reilly: 10.2%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect15.9%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.4%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Patrick Reilly: 1.0%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias9.3%This article: 30.3%Patrick Reilly: 22.7%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias30.3%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.2%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.9%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 2.4%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.9%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.6%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.8%Patrick Reilly: 5.5%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority16.8%This article: 1.2%Patrick Reilly: 0.5%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma1.2%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.5%Patrick Reilly: 3.0%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization1.5%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.4%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.4%Patrick Reilly: 12.2%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion5.4%This article: 9.3%Patrick Reilly: 1.1%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question9.3%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 1.4%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.6%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.0%Patrick Reilly: 2.6%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal12.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 26.1%Patrick Reilly: 2.0%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)26.1%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 36.3%Patrick Reilly: 2.0%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote36.3%This article: 5.4%Patrick Reilly: 2.4%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection5.4%This article: 19.8%Patrick Reilly: 12.1%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice19.8%This article: 9.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination9.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.1%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Patrick Reilly: 0.3%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Patrick Reilly: 0.6%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.8%

333 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers45%attributed speech184writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageThe New York Post • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageBen Crump • 30 words • 100.0% coverageBen Crump • 6 words • 100.0% coverageBen Crump • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBen Crump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageBen Crump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBen Crump • 19 words • 100.0% coverageBen Crump • 5 words • 0.0% coverageBen Crump • 9 words • 100.0% coverageBen Crump • 8 words • 100.0% coverageBen Crump • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ben Crump

100%flagged-word coverage
142 attributed words95% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Unattributed Quote+70.2 ptsWriter: 6.5%Ben Crump: 76.8%76.8%Biased Writer Voice-28.4 ptsWriter: 32.6%Ben Crump: 4.2%4.2%Indoctrination-16.3 ptsWriter: 16.3%Ben Crump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-9.8 ptsWriter: 9.8%Ben Crump: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -4.9 ptsWriter: 4.9%Ben Crump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.