Speaker summary
67% 18 analyzed articles/videos 1,551.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Crump results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 303.887 hits . Analysis detected 3,408.028 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,551.333 analyzed words across 18 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,476 of 26,836 speakers). This Ben Crump is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Ben Crump
Speaker details
Total words: 1,551.333
Content count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.9% BS Score18 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst