27 dead and dozens injured after massive blaze breaks out at Bangkok bar 24%

By Associated Press60%

7/13/2026, 12:49:28 AM

Keywords: Fires, Thailand, Nypost

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 709 faulty-reasoning hits from 547 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (16,778 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 76.70% of the article peer group.

See more of our coverage in your search results. 
Add The New York Post on Google 
BANGKOK  A huge fire engulfed a pub in Bangkok early Monday morning, killing at least 27 people and injuring dozens before firefighters brought the blaze under control, officials said. 
Footage shared online by first responders shows a huge blaze raging and plumes coming out of the front door of the Na Ladprao pub in the northern part of the Thai capital. 
People are seen trying to flee as thick black smoke billows into the sky. 
Rescuers said the fire was reported around midnight. 
Thailand Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul told reporters at the scene that 27 people died. 
He said the cause of the fire is under investigation. 
Police at the scene of the Na Ladprao pub in Bangkok, Thailand after a fire that killed at least 27 people broke out on July 13, 2026. 
REUTERS 
Emergency personnel next to body bags containing the remains of victims of the deadly fire. 
REUTERS 
Anutin said a musician who was performing at the pub told him that he saw smoke coming out of a circuit breaker near the stage before the power went out, then an explosion was heard and thick smoke quickly filled the place. 
Many of victims were found at the restrooms at the back of the pub, Anutin added. 
Bangkok Gov. 
Chadchart Sittipunt said 63 people were taken to the hospital, 22 of them in critical conditions. 
He said authorities are working on identifying victims as many did not carry an ID or were unconscious. 
Firefighters took about half an hour to bring the fire under control. 
Photos of the aftermath show charred tables and chairs, and the damaged interior of the pub. 
The charred inside of the pub after the fire was extinguished. 
REUTERS 
A burned keyboard from the fire in Bangkok. 
REUTERS 
Shoes and other items belonging to patrons at the bar when the fire broke out. 
REUTERS 
A registration spot was set up to gather information from relatives coming at the scene looking for their loved ones. 
Start your day with all you need to know 
Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. 
Thanks for signing up! 
Singer Sukanya Wongwongwai said she was performing nearby when she heard news of the fire and rushed to the scene because several of her bandmates were performing at the pub. 
She said one of them died, three were hospitalized, and one hasn’t been located. 
“From what I heard from people who were inside, when the fire started everything went dark. 
The power was out and there was smoke everywhere, so they couldn’t locate other people,” she said. 
Bodycam footage from rescue workers inspecting the site of the fire. via REUTERS 
Thailand has seen similar tragedies in the past. 
In 2022, 14 people were killed by a fire at a music pub i n the eastern part of the country. 
And more than a decade before that, 66 people were killed and more than 200 injured in a fire during a Jan. 
1, 2009 New Year’s Eve celebration at the Santika nightclub in Thailand’s capital. 
That blaze was apparently sparked by an indoor fireworks display. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Associated Press: 2.2%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 4.9%Associated Press: 0.8%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias4.9%This article: 11.2%Associated Press: 3.2%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 7.1%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 2.1%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.6%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%Associated Press: 8.7%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias15.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.0%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Associated Press: 1.4%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 3.4%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Associated Press: 2.7%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.4%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon1.8%This article: 10.1%Associated Press: 4.7%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion10.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.7%Associated Press: 2.2%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.5%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof1.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 18.1%Associated Press: 1.7%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal18.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Associated Press: 1.2%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.7%Associated Press: 1.3%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote13.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 11.3%Associated Press: 3.0%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice11.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Associated Press: 0.4%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.1%

547 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers40%attributed speech329writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageThe New York Post • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAnutin Charnvirakul • 14 words • 0.0% coverageAnutin Charnvirakul • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageREUTERS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageREUTERS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAnutin Charnvirakul • 42 words • 100.0% coverageAnutin Charnvirakul • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageChadchart Sittipunt • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChadchart Sittipunt • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageREUTERS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageREUTERS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageREUTERS • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageSukanya Wongwongwai • 30 words • 0.0% coverageSukanya Wongwongwai • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSukanya Wongwongwai • 16 words • 100.0% coverageSukanya Wongwongwai • 17 words • 100.0% coverageREUTERS • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Anutin Charnvirakul

80%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words38% of attributed speech84% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Unattributed Quote+51.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%Anutin Charnvirakul: 51.2%51.2%Biased Writer Voice-18.8 ptsWriter: 18.8%Anutin Charnvirakul: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Anutin Charnvirakul: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.