Speaker summary
⁠35%4 analyzed articles/videos275.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anutin Charnvirakul results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Confirmation Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 401.129 faulty-reasoning hits from 275.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,171 of 28,364 speakers). This Anutin Charnvirakul is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
Anutin Charnvirakul
Speaker details
Total words: 275.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
9.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos275.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.6%9.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos