Speaker summary
35% 45 analyzed articles/videos 962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 393 hits . Analysis detected 1,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 962 analyzed words across 45 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,356 of 28,187 speakers). This Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Supreme Court
Speaker details
Total words: 962
Article count: 45
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 5.3% BS Score45 analyzed videos962 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst