Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jonathan Sumption results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 1,389 hits. Analysis detected 4,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Jonathan Sumption is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Jonathan Sumption
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Jonathan Sumption (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 10,968
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 12.7%12.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The American disaster17%
UnHerd69%By Jonathan Sumption0%7/24/2026, 4:05:15 PM