Speaker summary
⁠80%5 analyzed articles/videos248.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These STAT+ results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 65.9% saturation with 163.863 hits. Analysis detected 313.863 faulty-reasoning hits from 248.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (24,530 of 27,473 speakers). This STAT+ is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group.
STAT+
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.7% percentile
9.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos248.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 65.9%65.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 4.1%4.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 65.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos