STAT44%

AstraZeneca 32%

By Andrew Joseph67%

7/9/2026, 9:13:42 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 187 faulty-reasoning hits from 282 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41% and a BS Rank of 32% (14,927 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the article peer group.

AstraZeneca, Ionis report major trial failure with heart disease drug 
The drug didn’t outperform placebo in a condition known as ATTR-CM 
Europe Correspondent 
Andrew covers the biopharma industry, scientific research, and public health across the continent. 
You can reach Andrew confidentially on Signal at drewqjoseph.71. 
LONDON  In a blow to its cardiovascular aspirations, AstraZeneca said Thursday that its drug for a heart disease  one that has become an increasingly competitive target for biopharma companies  failed in a pivotal trial. 
The drug, called Wainua, on which AstraZeneca is partnered with Ionis Pharmaceuticals, did not outperform placebo in reducing cardiovascular death and clinical events for patients with a condition known as ATTR-CM, or transthyretin-mediated amyloid cardiomyopathy. 
AstraZeneca’s U.S. shares were down some 8% in premarket trading, while its London-listed shares were down 9% early Thursday. 
Ionis shares, meanwhile, were down 12% in premarket hours. 
STAT+ Exclusive Story 
Already have an account? 
Log in 
This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers 
Unlock this article  plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector  by subscribing to STAT+. 
Totals $468 per year 
for 3 months, then $399/year 
Savings start at 25%! 
$300 Annually per user 
To read the rest of this story subscribe to STAT+. 
cardiology , drug development , Pharmaceuticals , STAT+ 
Submit a correction request Reprints 
STAT Plus: Roche ends Huntington’s gene-silencing programs 
STAT Plus: ARPA-H launches $160 million effort to develop custom gene editing drugs 
STAT Plus: Prime wins Beam arbitration, clearing path to clinic 
Adam's Biotech Scorecard 
STAT Plus: 931 days. 
The drug approval scandal hiding in plain sight 
STAT Plus: The quest to save Grace  and clear the way for rare disease patients everywhere 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.9%STAT: 3.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.7%STAT: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Andrew Joseph: 1.8%STAT: 3.9%Availability Heuristic2.8%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.7%STAT: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.1%STAT: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Andrew Joseph: 8.7%STAT: 8.2%Framing Effect6.4%This article: 1.4%Andrew Joseph: 0.9%STAT: 0.7%Loss Aversion1.4%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 1.3%STAT: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 3.3%STAT: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.3%STAT: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Andrew Joseph: 9.3%STAT: 8.5%Negativity Bias13.1%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.6%STAT: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.8%STAT: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.3%STAT: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.6%STAT: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.1%STAT: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.2%STAT: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.3%STAT: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.4%STAT: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 3.4%STAT: 4.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.2%STAT: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.3%STAT: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 3.6%STAT: 4.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.4%STAT: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.0%Andrew Joseph: 4.4%STAT: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion6.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.4%STAT: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.1%STAT: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.4%STAT: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.2%STAT: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.4%STAT: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 2.9%STAT: 3.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.3%STAT: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.4%STAT: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.5%STAT: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 16.0%Andrew Joseph: 5.2%STAT: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice16.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 1.3%STAT: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.0%STAT: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Andrew Joseph: 0.2%STAT: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.6%Andrew Joseph: 12.5%STAT: 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…20.6%

282 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers43%attributed speech162writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
AstraZeneca • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAstraZeneca • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT+ • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageSTAT+ • 7 words • 100.0% coverageSTAT+ • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT+ • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT+ • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT+ • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAdam • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSTAT+ • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageSTAT+ • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

AstraZeneca

97%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words32% of attributed speech25% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+92.4 ptsWriter: 4.9%AstraZeneca: 97.4%97.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -20.4 ptsWriter: 20.4%AstraZeneca: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.