Keyword summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos1,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cardiology results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 434 hits. Analysis detected 4,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,662 of 37,536 keywords). This Cardiology is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Cardiology
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Cardiology (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,432
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510031.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos