Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Kuchment — Boston Globe results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 306 hits . Analysis detected 1,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,155 of 6,628 authors). This Anna Kuchment — Boston Globe is worse (more manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Anna Kuchment — Boston Globe
Author details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.6% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 19.2% 19.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 4.1% 4.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.2%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst