Speaker summary
49%7 analyzed articles/videos319.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Security Administration results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, False Dilemma, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 323.285 faulty-reasoning hits from 319.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,921 of 28,364 speakers). This Social Security Administration is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Social Security Administration

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
16.9% BS Score7 analyzed videos319.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate