Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Jaffe results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,900 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (6,250 of 6,364 authors). This Susan Jaffe is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Susan Jaffe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠2%Susan Jaffe (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,900
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos