Speaker summary
68% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,143.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth Moulton results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.5% saturation with 426.377 hits . Analysis detected 3,165.188 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,143.667 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,925 of 28,364 speakers). This Seth Moulton is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Seth Moulton
Speaker details
Total words: 1,143.667
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 6.7% BS Score7 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 33.5% 33.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst