Breitbart82%

Moulton: We Should Talk Court Packing Because SCOTUS Is Saying Haitians Should Go Back 80%

By Ian Hanchett73%

6/26/2026, 2:17:15 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 77% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 243 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71.3% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,381 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.30% of the article peer group.

On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Laura Coates Live,” Rep. 
Seth Moulton (D-MA) argued that the Supreme Court is “basically saying that 350,000 people here should go back to a country that the State Department, under Marco Rubio, has said Americans can’t travel there because it’s so unsafe” and, in response, there should be talk about packing the court “to push back against the MAGA Republicans. 
” 
Moulton said, “This TPS ruling, they’re basically saying that 350,000 people here should go back to a country that the State Department, under Marco Rubio, has said Americans can’t travel there because it’s so unsafe. 
And, of course, for some of them, it’s going back, for a lot of young kids who were born here in America with Haitian parents, they’ve never even been to this country before, a country that’s deemed too unsafe, too dangerous for Americans to travel to. 
It will tear apart families, it will upend communities. 
American citizens will see their classmates just ripped out of their schools. 
And on top of this, it’s going to take away a lot of healthcare workers. 
” 
He added that there should be term limits and should be “ethics reform”, “But on top of that, let’s talk about packing the court, let’s talk about expanding it, let’s talk about what we need to do to push back against the MAGA Republicans. 
” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 37.4%Ian Hanchett: 4.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias37.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 2.8%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 13.5%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 46.9%Ian Hanchett: 11.0%Breitbart: 11.8%Framing Effect46.9%This article: 4.9%Ian Hanchett: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion4.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 1.5%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.6%Ian Hanchett: 3.0%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias22.6%This article: 53.9%Ian Hanchett: 7.7%Breitbart: 9.8%Negativity Bias53.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 2.1%Breitbart: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 41.2%Ian Hanchett: 6.0%Breitbart: 4.8%In-Group Bias41.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 4.2%Breitbart: 2.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.4%Breitbart: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 3.3%Breitbart: 2.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 4.3%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 3.7%Breitbart: 4.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 41.2%Ian Hanchett: 8.5%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma41.2%This article: 3.7%Ian Hanchett: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.4%Slippery Slope3.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 30.0%Ian Hanchett: 11.4%Breitbart: 8.0%Hasty Generalization30.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 18.1%Ian Hanchett: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Bandwagon18.1%This article: 77.0%Ian Hanchett: 15.1%Breitbart: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion77.0%This article: 37.4%Ian Hanchett: 3.0%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question37.4%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 2.0%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 20.2%Ian Hanchett: 3.8%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)20.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 43.6%Ian Hanchett: 3.2%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote43.6%This article: 23.0%Ian Hanchett: 3.1%Breitbart: 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection23.0%This article: 29.6%Ian Hanchett: 3.8%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice29.6%This article: 21.8%Ian Hanchett: 2.0%Breitbart: 2.0%Indoctrination21.8%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 5.1%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 1.2%Breitbart: 7.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

243 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers95%attributed speech12writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Moulton • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 56 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 35 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 46 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 12 words • 100.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSeth Moulton • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Seth Moulton

100%flagged-word coverage
217 attributed words94% of attributed speech0% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote+48.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Seth Moulton: 48.8%48.8%Biased Writer Voice+26.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Seth Moulton: 26.7%26.7%Quote-first Misdirection+25.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Seth Moulton: 25.8%25.8%Indoctrination+24.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Seth Moulton: 24.4%24.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.