Topic summary
27% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,742 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Temporary Protected Status (tps) results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 2,636 hits . Analysis detected 19,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,960 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (12,202 of 15,689 topics). This Temporary Protected Status (tps) is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Temporary Protected Status (tps)
Topic details
Total words: 22,960
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles23K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst