Keyword summary
46%5 analyzed articles/videos6,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seth Moulton results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 2,850 hits. Analysis detected 23,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,075 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,835 of 37,536 keywords). This Seth Moulton is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Seth Moulton
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
32%Seth Moulton (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate