Speaker summary
⁠47%5 analyzed articles/videos70 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Longwell results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 153.678 faulty-reasoning hits from 70 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (23,458 of 28,364 speakers). This Sarah Longwell is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Sarah Longwell
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510017.3% percentile
12.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos70 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos