Speaker summary
81% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA) results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.1% saturation with 370 hits . Analysis detected 1,667 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,366 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.6% and a BS Rank of 7% (25,162 of 26,916 speakers). This Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA) is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Royal Belgian Football Association (RBFA)
Speaker details
Total words: 1,366
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 7.6% BS Score5 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 27.1% 27.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Special Pleading: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst