Speaker summary
51% 25 analyzed articles/videos 2,882 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ronaldo Salgado results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 1,050.121 hits . Analysis detected 3,441.555 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,882 analyzed words across 25 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,142 of 28,364 speakers). This Ronaldo Salgado is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Ronaldo Salgado
Speaker details
Total words: 2,882
Article count: 25
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score25 analyzed videos2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 32.2% 32.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst