Author summary
⁠95%1 analyzed article/video1,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Austin C. McCoy results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 962 hits. Analysis detected 8,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,392 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (1,011 of 6,361 authors). This Austin C. McCoy is worse (more manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Austin C. McCoy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠85%Austin C. McCoy (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,392
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.1% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.9%21.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 18.3%18.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 12.8%12.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 17.0%17.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 14.9%14.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.9%13.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 18.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Author 12.8%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos