Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Albinson Linares results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 489 hits . Analysis detected 2,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,925 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,612 authors). This Albinson Linares is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Albinson Linares
Author details
Total words: 2,925
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Burden of Proof: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Personal Incredulity: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst