Speaker summary
⁠69%3 analyzed articles/videos100.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Putnam results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Composition/Division, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 40.8% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 267.235 faulty-reasoning hits from 100.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 30.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (14,732 of 28,160 speakers). This Robert Putnam is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Robert Putnam
Speaker details
Total words: 100.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.7% percentile
30.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos100.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 69.3%69.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.1%20.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 69.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 11.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos