Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Applebaum results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 662 hits . Analysis detected 4,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,509 of 6,625 authors). This Michael Applebaum is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group. Michael Applebaum
Author details
Total words: 4,768
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.0% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst