Speaker summary
71% 39 analyzed articles/videos 2,971 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Bonta results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Begging the Question , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 949.411 hits . Analysis detected 6,964.271 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,971 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,360 of 26,865 speakers). This Rob Bonta is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Rob Bonta
Speaker details
Total words: 2,971
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.4% BS Score39 analyzed videos3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 32.0% 32.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 1.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst