Author summary
32% 3 analyzed articles/videos 929 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dhackney results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 877 hits . Analysis detected 7,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,753 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 22% (5,176 of 6,603 authors). This Dhackney is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group. Dhackney
Author details
Total words: 9,753
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst