Speaker summary
47% 10 analyzed articles/videos 298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican National Committee results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Unattributed Quote , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 176 hits . Analysis detected 1,368.743 faulty-reasoning hits from 298 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (24,046 of 28,364 speakers). This Republican National Committee is better (less manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group. Republican National Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 298
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.2% percentile 11.7% BS Score10 analyzed videos298 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Speaker 28.7% 28.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 28.7% 28.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 8.1% Horn Effect: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst