Author summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos135 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ben Burgis results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 3,753 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,149 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,686 of 6,359 authors). This Ben Burgis is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Ben Burgis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%Ben Burgis (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,149
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Straw Man: Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos