Speaker summary
29%8 analyzed articles/videos221 analyzed words
BS Summary: These RCMP results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Status Quo Bias, and Burden of Proof, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 331 faulty-reasoning hits from 221 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 11.2% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,351 of 28,364 speakers). This RCMP is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.1% percentile
11.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos221 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.6%30.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate