Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Sampson results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 122 hits . Analysis detected 1,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,268 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,364 of 6,629 authors). This Andrew Sampson is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group. Andrew Sampson
Author details
Total words: 2,268
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst