Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CBC News results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,344 hits . Analysis detected 8,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,508 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,149 of 6,263 authors). This CBC News is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. CBC News
Author details
Total words: 10,508
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.8% 12.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.4% 5.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst