Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ariana Kelland results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,575 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Ariana Kelland is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ariana Kelland
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Ariana Kelland (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,575
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Burden of Proof: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Special Pleading: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.0%Primacy Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos