Speaker summary
71% 10 analyzed articles/videos 578.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rashida Tlaib results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.3% saturation with 181.22 hits . Analysis detected 1,271.2 faulty-reasoning hits from 578.667 analyzed words across 10 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,920 of 28,364 speakers). This Rashida Tlaib is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Rashida Tlaib
Speaker details
Total words: 578.667
Content count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 6.7% BS Score10 analyzed videos578.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 31.3% 31.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.6% 12.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Composition/Division: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst