Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,247 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ali Harb results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 3,063 hits . Analysis detected 21,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,709 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,302 of 6,629 authors). This Ali Harb is better (less manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Ali Harb
Author details
Total words: 26,709
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst