Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hafsa Adil results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 361 hits . Analysis detected 3,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,624 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,033 of 6,476 authors). This Hafsa Adil is worse (more manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Hafsa Adil
Author details
Total words: 3,624
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.6% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.1% 9.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.9% 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst