Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Osgood results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Framing Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 432 hits. Analysis detected 2,994 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,170 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,572 of 6,348 authors). This Brian Osgood is worse (more manipulative) than 59.50% of the peer group.
Brian Osgood
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Brian Osgood (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,170
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.5% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos