Speaker summary
⁠40%3 analyzed articles/videos167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rafael Grossi results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 40% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 440.602 faulty-reasoning hits from 167 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,294 of 28,364 speakers). This Rafael Grossi is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group.
Rafael Grossi
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.0% percentile
20.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos167 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 40.0%40.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.3%26.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos