Speaker summary
52%7 analyzed articles/videos206.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Policy Institute of California results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Anchoring Bias, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 404.703 faulty-reasoning hits from 206.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.5% and a BS Rank of 30% (20,058 of 28,364 speakers). This Public Policy Institute of California is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Public Policy Institute of California
Speaker details
Total words: 206.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
18.5% BS Score7 analyzed videos206.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often