Speaker summary
⁠59%4 analyzed articles/videos343.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prince Harry results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 116.457 hits. Analysis detected 750.94 faulty-reasoning hits from 343.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Prince Harry is better (less manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Prince Harry
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

16% percentile
025507510016.1% percentile
12.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos343.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.7%24.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.5%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos