Speaker summary
⁠56%4 analyzed articles/videos101.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philips results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 59.2% saturation with 65.439 hits. Analysis detected 195.913 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,385 of 28,364 speakers). This Philips is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Philips
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 101.667
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
26.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos101.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 59.2%59.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 48.4%48.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 59.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 48.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 5.3%Special Pleading: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos