Author summary
⁠40%4 analyzed articles/videos2,078 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scharon Harding results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 558 hits. Analysis detected 8,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,384 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (5,243 of 6,602 authors). This Scharon Harding is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Scharon Harding
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠21%Scharon Harding (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,384
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.4%4.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos