Author summary
57% 2 analyzed articles/videos 5,416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Carnoy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 6,536 hits . Analysis detected 30,980 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,568 of 6,628 authors). This David Carnoy is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group. David Carnoy
Author details
Total words: 32,356
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles32.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 20.2% 20.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.8% 4.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 20.2%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst