Speaker summary
⁠49%3 analyzed articles/videos184.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Jenniskens results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 32.4% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 343.396 faulty-reasoning hits from 184.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (20,116 of 28,326 speakers). This Peter Jenniskens is better (less manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Peter Jenniskens
Speaker details
Total words: 184.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.0% percentile
18.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos184.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 27.3%27.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos