Author summary
28% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Passant Rabie results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 901 hits . Analysis detected 5,998 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,144 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,998 of 6,316 authors). This Passant Rabie is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Passant Rabie
Author details
Total words: 10,144
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst