Speaker summary
69% 128 analyzed articles/videos 7,461 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Hegseth results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Begging the Question , and Overconfidence Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 1,073.83 hits . Analysis detected 11,409.856 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,461 analyzed words across 128 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,744 of 25,875 speakers). This Pete Hegseth is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Pete Hegseth
Speaker details
Total words: 7,461
Content count: 128
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score128 analyzed videos7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.2% 3.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst