$37.5 Billion Well Spent To Off the Ayatollah 93%

By Washington Free Beacon Editors93%

7/22/2026, 9:45:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 2,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 524 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.5% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,502 of 21,168 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.90% of the article peer group.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth told lawmakers on Tuesday that the financial cost of the Iran war has so far totaled an estimated $37.5 billion. 
What a bargain! 
It's a pittance to eviscerate the Islamist thugs who, since 1979, have built and presided over a ruthless machinery of internal repression while waging a jihad against the United States, Israel, and all freedom-loving people across the region. 
The barbarism of the Iranian regime was on display most recently in January when Khamenei personally ordered the IRGC, the Basij forces, and the national police to gun down protesters in the streets with impunity amid an information blackout. 
But Iran has deployed the same kind of terror against American citizens wherever it could find them, from the humiliating hostage crisis of 1979 to the Marine barracks attack of 1983 to the Oct. 7, 2023 massacre that left 46 Americans dead. 
The IRGC was responsible for the murder and maiming of thousands of Americans in Iraq during the war there—one in every six American deaths, according to an official Pentagon estimate. 
All of this went largely unanswered until President Trump gave the green light to take out Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani in January 2020 and the ayatollah and his top advisers in February of this year. 
So far as government spending goes—this is bang for our buck. 
Consider some of the initiatives for which the Biden administration shelled out billions. 
A 2021 infrastructure law signed by the president provided $7.5 billion for electric vehicle charging ports across the country. 
The Biden team had gotten just seven up and running by June 2024, and the Government Accountability Office found that by July 2025, fewer than 400 were operating in part because the feds had not provided "measurable targets and time frames." 
The EV charger debacle mirrors that of the $42.5 billion national broadband buildout intended to connect rural communities to the internet. 
It was beset by bureaucratic bickering, delays, and inefficiencies. 
Three years after its approval in 2021, 16 states were still waiting for approval. 
It took the Trump administration's intervention in 2025—including the removal of a "digital equity" requirement—to move things forward. 
Those numbers pale in comparison to the hundreds of billions flushed down the toilet by crooks who had little trouble exploiting numerous slapdash COVID relief programs, according to the Government Accountability Office—which recommended that, moving forward, the federal government "consider that self-certification alone is not sufficient as a fraud control to mitigate misrepresentation" and "ensure payment integrity checks and fraud controls are part of program design." 
Oh. 
Democrats are happy to spend billions on handouts that at best fall somewhere between wasteful and fraudulent but never fail to raise hackles at the cost of keeping Americans safe. 
The real cost of this war has been the human toll—the American families that worry about their sons and daughters, mothers and fathers in harm's way. 
And, tragically, the 18 families who will not see their loved ones back home. 
To honor them appropriately, Congress must provide sufficient resources for the military to finish the job. 
Pass the damn supplemental. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 21.6%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 14.7%freebeacon.com: 7.0%Confirmation Bias21.6%This article: 8.4%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 3.3%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Anchoring Bias8.4%This article: 16.4%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 10.5%freebeacon.com: 2.9%Availability Heuristic16.4%This article: 4.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.6%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 6.9%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.2%freebeacon.com: 1.0%Hindsight Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.7%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 7.4%freebeacon.com: 12.8%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 8.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.8%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Loss Aversion8.0%This article: 0.8%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.8%This article: 6.7%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 58.8%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 30.8%freebeacon.com: 15.7%Negativity Bias58.8%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 4.4%freebeacon.com: 2.2%In-Group Bias13.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 9.7%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Halo Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.3%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 4.7%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Recency Bias15.3%This article: 2.5%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 3.0%freebeacon.com: 0.6%Primacy Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.7%freebeacon.com: 5.9%Ad Hominem7.3%This article: 5.7%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.8%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Straw Man5.7%This article: 26.1%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 10.2%freebeacon.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority26.1%This article: 5.7%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.1%freebeacon.com: 2.0%False Dilemma5.7%This article: 3.1%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope3.1%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.6%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 21.4%freebeacon.com: 8.8%Hasty Generalization20.6%This article: 15.1%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 4.4%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Red Herring15.1%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 44.3%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 23.1%freebeacon.com: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion44.3%This article: 6.7%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.5%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Begging the Question6.7%This article: 18.3%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 7.2%freebeacon.com: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.3%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 1.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.8%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 1.4%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.8%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.6%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Composition/Division4.0%This article: 7.4%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 6.1%freebeacon.com: 2.0%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.7%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.5%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.0%freebeacon.com: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.2%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 1.7%freebeacon.com: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.2%This article: 56.1%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 37.7%freebeacon.com: 17.7%Biased Writer Voice56.1%This article: 16.8%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 11.8%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Indoctrination16.8%This article: 0.0%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 19.1%freebeacon.com: 10.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias9.2%This article: 14.7%Washington Free Beacon Editors: 2.4%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.7%

524 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.